BFA Degree Project Evaluations 2022 Your review of The Final Crit Communication Design Class of 2022 Degree Projects is extremely valuable to our program’s growth and assessment. Thank you for your time and commitment to Design Miami OH. The Final Crit Degree Projects BFA Degree Project Evaluation -2022 Name of BFA Candidate whose Degree Project is being evaluated. * Abrams, Emilie Anthony, Rachel Borradaile, Brandon Brandstatter, Bella Buecker, Katie Gebhart, Cassidy Glickman, Gracie Hite, Abby Hopkins, Natalie Jacquemin, Annie Lepley, Bailey McNulty, Laurin McQuitty, Sayde Nichols, Elliot Petersen, Hailey Schulte, Caitlin Sussman, Lexi Troyer, Lela Vincent, Elijah Evaluator’s Name Dennis Cheatham Zack Tucker Communication Design BFA Learning Outcomes Use the following outcomes to evaluate the Degree Project Presentation. At what level did the individual conduct comprehensive research into their area of focus? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak At what level did the individual create design solutions with a high degree of formal detail and aesthetic acuity? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak At what level did the individual create relevant design solutions informed by research with a high degree of functional detail? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak At what level did the individual develop targeted solutions for a specific audience? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak At what level did the individual present content clearly and demonstrate advanced verbal communication skills? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak At what level did the individual demonstrate careful attention to the execution of the visual presentation (composition, typography, hierarchy)? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak Design Miami OH Program-wide Learning Outcomes People are intelligent in many different ways. Our program defines these Multiple Intelligences for Design as a model we call PACES. Please evaluate the BFA Candidate’s work using the five measures below. Practical Intelligence: At what level did the individual apply design processes and produce outcomes within practical constraints? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak Examples: on-time, followed criteria or guidelines, included essential content to ensure clarity. Analytical Intelligence: At what level did the individual demonstrate relevant and accurate decision making for needs being addressed? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak Examples: well-reasoned, justified designs, met stakeholder needs, used iteration to improve work, made logical conclusions. Creative Intelligence: At what level did the individual generate inventive and engaging outcomes? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak Examples: unexpected approach and/or design outcome, integrated unique content combinations, examined under-addressed concepts, implemented new media. Emotional Intelligence: At what level did the individual accurately interpret and express emotions that are appropriate for the context? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak Examples: design that captured the right emotions for the communication, explored complex emotional content. Social Intelligence: At what level did the individual demonstrate an ability to effectively engage and collaborate with others? * Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Weak Examples: included a range of participants, methods that involved people and collaboration, empowered participants to have a voice in the work, considered communities and/or individuals as integral to the project. What was the individual’s greatest strength? What is an area where the individual could improve? Anything else you’d like to share? What is your overall impression of this student’s Degree Project? * Very Satisfied Satisfied Neither Satisfied Nor Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied If you are human, leave this field blank. Submit Δ